Technology |
Benefits |
Drawbacks |
Fuel Choice |
Size (kW) |
Fuel Cells
High temp: Installed cost is highly variable; efficiency is 45% to 55%
Low temp: Installed cost is $2,000 to $3,000/kW; efficiency is 30% to 40% |
- Very high fuel efficiencies from hydrogen to electricity
- Potential to operate baseload with utility standby
- Possible residential application — a no-moving-parts energy appliance
- Very high efficiencies when combined with heat recovery
- Green technology — water and heat are only emissions from hydrogen fuel, low emissions from other fuels
|
- Few commercially available devices
- Most research efforts are for automotive applications
- Need for fuel reformer in almost all applications (reduced fuel to electrical efficiencies)
- Not a zero-emission technology — the effect of that may vary by state
- Cold start is 1-2 days for MCFC, 3 hours for PAFC, 1 hour for PEMFC, and 2 minutes for SOFC
|
Direct by hydrogen; natural gas, propane, methanol, or other hydrogen-rich source through reformer |
MCFC (molten carbonate fuel cells): 250-2,850
PAFC (Phosphoric acid fuel cells): 200
PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cells): 3-250
SOFC (solid oxide fuel cells): 225-2,240 |
Photovoltaic
Installed cost is highly variable |
- No variable costs for fuel
- No moving parts — inexpensive maintenance and long life
- No emissions, no noise
- Can be used for peak shaving
- Highly reliable, mature technology
|
- Big foot print (600 ft2/kW)
- High installed costs
- Not suited for baseload
- Not suited for standby except when accompanied by storage
- Variable energy output
|
None |
Limited by available area |
Large Wind Turbines
Installed cost is highly variable |
- No variable costs for fuel
- In utility implementation, zero emissions may allow green power price premium
- Mature technology
- Multiple manufacturers
|
- Need to meet siting requirements
- Generation is intermittent with wind, and energy output can vary with wind speed squared or cubed over operation range. Not appropriate as backup or off-grid applications
- Needs utility source for energy purchases and sales
- Can require footprint up to 100ft2/kW
|
None — need winds of >12 mph or sometimes higher |
<1-1,000 |
Internal Combustion
Installed cost is $400/kW to $600/kW; efficiency is 28% to 37% |
- Bulk power delivered when utility is unavailable
- Fast startup allows less sensitive processes to be served without need for UPSs (emergency lighting, HVAC, elevators, some manufacturing processes)
- Very mature, stable technology
- Can be paralleled to grid or other generators with controls package
- Can be very efficient when combined with heat recovery
|
- Insurance policy effect: Capital is only being used when standby generator is running
- Marginal cost of production generally favors utility source in all but rare occasions
- Environmental issues — emissions and noise
- Possible on-site fuel storage needs
|
Diesel, natural gas, propane, bio-gas, other petroleum distillates |
<1-6,000 |
Small Gas Turbines
Installed cost is +/- $650; efficiency is 25% to 40% |
- Highly efficient when used with thermal recovery
- Technology commercially available today — most likely candidate for on-site needs >3MWe in DG application
- Can operate baseload, standby, or peaking
- Several manufacturers
- Relatively low installed costs
|
- Potentially onerous siting and permitting requirements
- Environmental issues — emissions and noise
- Possible on-site fuel storage needs
|
Natural gas, distillate, methane |
3,000-15,000 |
Microturbines
Installed cost is $750/kW to $900/kW; efficiency is 28% to 33% |
- Thermal recovery improves efficiency
- Thermal output for residential or small commercial apps
- Operable as base, peaking, or standby
- Commercially available in limited quantities
|
- Insufficient thermal output for industrial apps
|
Natural gas, propane, diesel, multi-fuel |
15-250 |